A6 9220e vs Engineering Sample 506E8
Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 7.2 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 7.2 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
506e8
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
6 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2017
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
211.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
23.91k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
21.03k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
5.05k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
6.4k (x3.76)
TOTAL
22.34k
56.39k (x2.52)
Multithread
9220e
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
95.3k (x8.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
91.94k (x7.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
22.06k (x6.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
2.3k (x1.3)
TOTAL
29.39k
211.6k (x7.2)
Performance/W
9220e
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W