| | | | | | |

A6 9220e vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The 9220e is based on Excavator architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.4 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
810f10
Core
Stoney Ridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
71.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
10.73k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
18.15k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
3.99k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
3.89k (x2.29)
TOTAL
22.34k
36.77k (x1.65)

Multithread

9220e

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
20.11k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
36.87k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
10.74k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
3.31k (x1.86)
TOTAL
29.39k
71.02k (x2.42)

Performance/W
9220e
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
4735 points/W

Performance/GHz
9220e
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4