A6 9220e vs A9 9420
Description
Both models 9220e and 9420 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.6 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9220e gets a score of 29.4 k points while the 9420 gets 46.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.6 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
670f00
Core
Stoney Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FT4
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
June 2017
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
22.34k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.39k points
46.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9220e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
7.84k
11.74k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.54k
16.05k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.27k
3.26k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
2.05k (x1.21)
TOTAL
22.34k
33.09k (x1.48)
Multithread
9220e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
11.42k
18.57k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
20.11k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.62k
5.27k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
2.38k (x1.34)
TOTAL
29.39k
46.33k (x1.58)
Performance/W
9220e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1903 points/W
1238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2097 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
603 points/W
352 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
296 points/W
159 points/W
TOTAL
4898 points/W
3089 points/W
Performance/GHz
9220e
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
3265 points/GHz
3260 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4390 points/GHz
4458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
905 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
709 points/GHz
570 points/GHz
TOTAL
9309 points/GHz
9192 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4