A6 9210 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
f4a
Core
Stoney Ridge
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.55 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
15 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
June 2016
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
3.87k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
8.17k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.67k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
1.82k (x0.76)
TOTAL
20.22k
16.53k (x0.82)
Multithread
9210
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
3.46k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
22.59k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
8.09k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.85k (x1.1)
TOTAL
25.23k
37k (x1.47)
Performance/W
9210
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4