A6 9210 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 2.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 2.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
106a5
Core
Stoney Ridge
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
7.51k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
4.93k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.02k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.74k (x1.15)
TOTAL
20.22k
18.2k (x0.9)
Multithread
9210
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
31.33k (x4.23)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
23.11k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
15.78k (x4.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.55k (x0.98)
TOTAL
25.23k
72.77k (x2.88)
Performance/W
9210
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4