A6 9210 vs Xeon L5430
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.
Summarizing, the L5430 is 2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
1067a
Core
Stoney Ridge
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x6144 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
51.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
3.09k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
6.86k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.66k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.01k (x1.26)
TOTAL
20.22k
15.62k (x0.77)
Multithread
9210
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
12.4k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
27.27k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
10.41k (x3.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.57k (x0.6)
TOTAL
25.23k
51.64k (x2.05)
Performance/W
9210
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
1033 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4