| | | | | | |

A6 9210 vs Pentium G3260


Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G3260 is 2.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
306c3
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
58.89k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
11.73k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
10.45k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.55k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.83k (x1.61)
TOTAL
20.22k
30.56k (x1.51)

Multithread

9210

G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
22.99k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
20.53k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
8.82k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
6.55k (x2.52)
TOTAL
25.23k
58.89k (x2.33)

Performance/W
9210
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
1111 points/W

Performance/GHz
9210
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4