A6 9210 vs Core 2 Duo P8400
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the P8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the P8400 gets 21 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
10676
Core
Stoney Ridge
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.267 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.267 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
July 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
11.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
21.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
2.43k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
5.4k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.13k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
1.43k (x0.6)
TOTAL
20.22k
11.38k (x0.56)
Multithread
9210
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
4.81k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
10.58k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.18k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.45k (x0.56)
TOTAL
25.23k
21.02k (x0.83)
Performance/W
9210
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
423 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
841 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
P8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
2383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
629 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5022 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4