A6 9210 vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the E8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8400 is 1.1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the E8400 gets 27.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E8400 is 1.1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
1067a
Core
Stoney Ridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
17.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
27.11k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
3.3k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
7.28k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.88k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.83k (x1.61)
TOTAL
20.22k
17.28k (x0.85)
Multithread
9210
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
6.3k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
13.71k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
5.32k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.78k (x0.68)
TOTAL
25.23k
27.11k (x1.07)
Performance/W
9210
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
97 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
211 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
82 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
417 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
E8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
2426 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1278 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4