| | | | | | |

A6 9210 vs Core 2 Duo E8200


Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E8200 is 1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
10676
Core
Stoney Ridge
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
25.39k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
3k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
6.62k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.55k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
3.6k (x1.51)
TOTAL
20.22k
15.77k (x0.78)

Multithread

9210

E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
5.83k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
12.64k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.97k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.95k (x0.75)
TOTAL
25.23k
25.39k (x1.01)

Performance/W
9210
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
391 points/W

Performance/GHz
9210
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4