A6 9210 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the E7200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
10676
Core
Stoney Ridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.533 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
25.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
2.93k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
6.48k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.6k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
1.45k (x0.61)
TOTAL
20.22k
13.46k (x0.67)
Multithread
9210
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
5.85k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
12.91k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
5.22k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.23k (x0.47)
TOTAL
25.23k
25.21k (x1)
Performance/W
9210
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4