A6 9210 vs Core m7-6Y75
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.
Summarizing, the m7-6Y75 is 2 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
406e3
Core
Stoney Ridge
Skylake-Y
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
53.58k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
10.24k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
15.33k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.97k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
5.32k (x2.17)
TOTAL
20.78k
33.86k (x1.63)
Multithread
9210
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
16.78k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
25.09k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
6.14k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
5.58k (x2.16)
TOTAL
27.13k
53.58k (x1.98)
Performance/W
9210
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
13395 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4