A6 9210 vs Core i7-640LM
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-640LM is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
20655
Core
Stoney Ridge
Calpella
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
31.74k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
7.01k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
4.58k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.73k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.03k (x0.85)
TOTAL
20.22k
16.35k (x0.81)
Multithread
9210
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
12.93k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
10.21k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
6.22k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.37k (x0.91)
TOTAL
25.23k
31.74k (x1.26)
Performance/W
9210
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
517 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
409 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
1269 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
2627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
762 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
6130 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4