A6 9210 vs Core i7-5820K
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 4.8 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 4.8 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306f2
Core
Stoney Ridge
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
15 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
15360 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
129.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
12.03k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
11.23k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.55k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
3.72k (x1.52)
TOTAL
20.78k
31.53k (x1.52)
Multithread
9210
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
49.48k (x5.87)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
52.21k (x4.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
19.7k (x5.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
7.67k (x2.96)
TOTAL
27.13k
129.06k (x4.76)
Performance/W
9210
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
922 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4