A6 9210 vs Core i7-3770
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i7-3770 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 4.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i7-3770 gets 133.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-3770 is 4.9 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306a9
Core
Stoney Ridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/8
TDP
15 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
4x62+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
34.59k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
133.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
12.55k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
12.11k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.69k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
5.25k (x2.15)
TOTAL
20.78k
34.59k (x1.66)
Multithread
9210
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
49.56k (x5.88)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
56.21k (x4.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
22.17k (x6.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
5.75k (x2.22)
TOTAL
27.13k
133.7k (x4.93)
Performance/W
9210
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
644 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
730 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
1736 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i7-3770
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
3104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1202 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
8870 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4