A6 9210 vs Core i5-7500
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-7500 gets 149.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 5.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-7500 gets 149.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 5.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
906e9
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
191.71k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
14.09k (x2.89)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
19.8k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
5.34k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
8.45k (x3.54)
TOTAL
20.22k
47.67k (x2.36)
Multithread
9210
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
53.99k (x7.29)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
77.43k (x6.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
20.81k (x6.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.53k (x0.97)
TOTAL
25.23k
154.77k (x6.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
14.03k (x2.98)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
21.07k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
5.15k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
7.77k (x3.18)
TOTAL
20.78k
48.03k (x2.31)
Multithread
9210
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
50.12k (x5.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
74.8k (x5.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
19.69k (x5.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
5.19k (x2.01)
TOTAL
27.13k
149.79k (x5.52)
Performance/W
9210
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
771 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
1151 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
80 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
2305 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
5545 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1356 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
12639 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4