A6 9210 vs Core i5-3340M
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-3340M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 2.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-3340M gets 62.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-3340M is 2.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
306a9
Core
Stoney Ridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
31.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
62.75k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
11.51k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
11.13k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
4.4k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
4.55k (x1.86)
TOTAL
20.78k
31.58k (x1.52)
Multithread
9210
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
22.59k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
25.49k (x1.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
10.42k (x3.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
4.25k (x1.64)
TOTAL
27.13k
62.75k (x2.31)
Performance/W
9210
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
645 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
728 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
1793 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i5-3340M
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
3273 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1295 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
9288 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4