A6 9210 vs Core i5-2410M
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.4 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the i5-2410M gets 38.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.4 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
206a7
Core
Stoney Ridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
20.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
38.68k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
7.98k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
6.55k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.28k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.7k (x1.13)
TOTAL
20.22k
20.52k (x1.01)
Multithread
9210
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
13.66k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
13.17k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
7.05k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
3.02k (x1.16)
TOTAL
25.23k
36.9k (x1.46)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
7.38k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
6.76k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.3k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.66k (x1.09)
TOTAL
20.78k
20.1k (x0.97)
Multithread
9210
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
14.17k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
14.71k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
6.93k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
2.87k (x1.11)
TOTAL
27.13k
38.68k (x1.43)
Performance/W
9210
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
198 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
1105 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
i5-2410M
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
2543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
2332 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
917 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
6932 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4