A6 9210 vs Celeron 4205U
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 4205U gets 37.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4205U is 1.5 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
806ec
Core
Stoney Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
20.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
37.61k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
6.53k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
9.46k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.28k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.34k (x0.98)
TOTAL
20.22k
20.61k (x1.02)
Multithread
9210
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
12.97k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
18.12k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
4.33k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.18k (x0.84)
TOTAL
25.23k
37.61k (x1.49)
Performance/W
9210
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
865 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
289 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
146 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
2507 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
4205U
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
3629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1269 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
11451 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4