| | | | | | |

A6 9210 vs E1 2500


Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the 2500 is based on Jaguar.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 2500 gets 9.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 9210 is 3 times faster than the 2500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
670f00
700f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kabini
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
June 2016
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
6.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
9.13k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
2.35k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
2.21k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
1.24k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
0.84k (x0.34)
TOTAL
20.78k
6.64k (x0.32)

Multithread

9210

2500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
3.3k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
3.21k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
1.76k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
0.87k (x0.34)
TOTAL
27.13k
9.13k (x0.34)

Performance/W
9210
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
220 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
214 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
117 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
609 points/W

Performance/GHz
9210
2500
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
1581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
600 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
4745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4