A6 9210 vs A9 9420
Description
Both models 9210 and 9420 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9210 is 1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
670f00
Core
Stoney Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
46.33k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
8.41k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
11.48k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.29k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
2.24k (x0.94)
TOTAL
20.22k
25.41k (x1.26)
Multithread
9210
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
11.25k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
13.69k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
2.09k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.87k (x0.72)
TOTAL
25.23k
28.89k (x1.14)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
7.55k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
13.9k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
3.11k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.18k (x0.89)
TOTAL
20.78k
26.74k (x1.29)
Multithread
9210
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
9.09k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
12.25k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
3k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
1.81k (x0.7)
TOTAL
27.13k
26.15k (x0.96)
Performance/W
9210
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
1743 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4