A6 9210 vs 7310
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
730f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Carrizo-L
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
June 2016
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
35.87k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9210
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
4.71k
4.08k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
11.03k
3.76k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.21k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
1.12k (x0.46)
TOTAL
20.78k
11.17k (x0.54)
Multithread
9210
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
8.43k
13.38k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.8k
13.51k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.32k
7.39k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.59k
1.59k (x0.62)
TOTAL
27.13k
35.87k (x1.32)
Performance/W
9210
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
562 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
853 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
221 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
1809 points/W
1435 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
1683 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3938 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
927 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
873 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
7420 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4