A6 9210 vs 3500
Description
The 9210 is based on Excavator architecture while the 3500 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9210 gets a score of 25.2 k points while the 3500 gets 32.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
300f10
Core
Stoney Ridge
Llano
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket FM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
3/3
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
1x96+2x32 kB
3x64+3x64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3x1024 kB
Date
June 2016
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
20.78k points
13.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.13k points
32.72k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
9210
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.87k
4.75k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.38k
4.72k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.59k
2.49k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.38k
1.69k (x0.71)
TOTAL
20.22k
13.65k (x0.67)
Multithread
9210
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
12.56k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
11.87k
12.58k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.35k
6.08k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.49k (x0.57)
TOTAL
25.23k
32.72k (x1.3)
Performance/W
9210
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
494 points/W
193 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
792 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/W
93 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
23 points/W
TOTAL
1682 points/W
503 points/W
Performance/GHz
9210
3500
Test#1 (Integers)
1740 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3707 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/GHz
1039 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
851 points/GHz
704 points/GHz
TOTAL
7222 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4