| | | | | | |

A6 7310 vs Core i5-3337U


Description
The 7310 is based on Puma architecture while the i5-3337U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the i5-3337U gets 48.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3337U is 1.3 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
730f01
306a9
Core
Carrizo-L
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
FP4
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
25 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2015
January 2013
Mean monothread perf.
11.17k points
23.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.87k points
48.3k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7310
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
8.64k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
8.55k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
3.42k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.12k
3.22k (x2.87)
TOTAL
11.17k
23.82k (x2.13)

Multithread

7310

i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.38k
17.28k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
13.51k
19.67k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
7.59k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.59k
3.75k (x2.36)
TOTAL
35.87k
48.3k (x1.35)

Performance/W
7310
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
1017 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
1157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
296 points/W
447 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
221 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
2841 points/W

Performance/GHz
7310
i5-3337U
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/GHz
3201 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1566 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/GHz
1267 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
467 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
4654 points/GHz
8824 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4