A6 7310 vs Core i3-3240
Description
The 7310 is based on Puma architecture while the i3-3240 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1.4 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the i3-3240 gets 49.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1.4 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
730f01
306a9
Core
Carrizo-L
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FP4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
25 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2015
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
11.17k points
24.48k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.87k points
49.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7310
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
8.46k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
10.69k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
3.09k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.12k
2.23k (x1.99)
TOTAL
11.17k
24.48k (x2.19)
Multithread
7310
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
13.38k
17.92k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
13.51k
21.21k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
7.77k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.59k
2.8k (x1.76)
TOTAL
35.87k
49.7k (x1.39)
Performance/W
7310
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
326 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
386 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
296 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
904 points/W
Performance/GHz
7310
i3-3240
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/GHz
2490 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1566 points/GHz
3145 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/GHz
910 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
467 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
TOTAL
4654 points/GHz
7200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4