A6 7310 vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
The 7310 is based on Puma architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.2 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7310 is 1.2 times faster than the 5150 APU. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
730f01
700f01
Core
Carrizo-L
Kabini
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
FP4
AM1
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
25 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2015
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
11.17k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.87k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7310
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
3.02k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
2.62k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
1.59k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.12k
1.02k (x0.91)
TOTAL
11.17k
8.26k (x0.74)
Multithread
7310
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
13.38k
12.06k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
13.51k
10.42k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
6.32k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.59k
1.26k (x0.79)
TOTAL
35.87k
30.06k (x0.84)
Performance/W
7310
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
296 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
7310
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1566 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
467 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
4654 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4