A6 7310 vs A10 5745M
Description
The 7310 is based on Puma architecture while the 5745M is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5745M is 1 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7310 gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 5745M gets 37.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5745M is 1 times faster than the 7310. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
730f01
610f31
Core
Carrizo-L
Richland
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
FP4
Socket FP2
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
25 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2015
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
11.17k points
17.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.87k points
37.11k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
7310
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
6.66k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
3.76k
5.63k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
2.4k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.12k
2.39k (x2.13)
TOTAL
11.17k
17.08k (x1.53)
Multithread
7310
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.38k
13.55k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
13.51k
13.9k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
6.75k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.59k
2.91k (x1.83)
TOTAL
35.87k
37.11k (x1.03)
Performance/W
7310
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
535 points/W
542 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
540 points/W
556 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
296 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
1435 points/W
1484 points/W
Performance/GHz
7310
5745M
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/GHz
2297 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1566 points/GHz
1941 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
921 points/GHz
828 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
467 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
4654 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4