A6 3500 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The 3500 is based on K10 architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.5 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.5 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
10676
Core
Llano
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
3/3
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+3x64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3x1024 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.65k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.72k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.75k
2.88k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
4.72k
6.31k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.53k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
1.35k (x0.8)
TOTAL
13.65k
13.08k (x0.96)
Multithread
3500
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.56k
5.45k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
11.5k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
4.02k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.49k
1.05k (x0.7)
TOTAL
32.72k
22.02k (x0.67)
Performance/W
3500
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
93 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
503 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1978 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1966 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1039 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5686 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4