A6 3500 vs Xeon W3520
Description
The 3500 is based on K10 architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 2.2 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3520 is 2.2 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
106a5
Core
Llano
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
3/3
4 /8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+3x64 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
3x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2011
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.65k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.72k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
4.75k
7.35k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
4.72k
4.89k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.9k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
2.82k (x1.67)
TOTAL
13.65k
17.96k (x1.32)
Multithread
3500
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
12.56k
29.69k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
22.26k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
14.91k (x2.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.49k
6.29k (x4.21)
TOTAL
32.72k
73.16k (x2.24)
Performance/W
3500
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
93 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
503 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1978 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1966 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1039 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
5686 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4