A6 3500 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The 3500 is based on K10 architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.5 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.5 times faster than the 3500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
506e3
Core
Llano
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
3/3
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+3x64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2011
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.65k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.72k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.75k
8.56k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
4.72k
12.25k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
3.17k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
3.35k (x1.98)
TOTAL
13.65k
27.33k (x2)
Multithread
3500
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.56k
16.42k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
23.61k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
5.75k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.49k
3.55k (x2.37)
TOTAL
32.72k
49.34k (x1.51)
Performance/W
3500
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
93 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
503 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1978 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1966 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1039 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
5686 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4