A6 3500 vs Athlon II M300
Description
Both models 3500 and M300 are based on K10 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.8 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.8 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
100f62
Core
Llano
Caspian
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
3/3
2/2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+3x64 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
3x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
August 2011
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.65k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.72k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.75k
2.66k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
4.72k
3.84k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
1.97k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
1.1k (x0.65)
TOTAL
13.65k
9.57k (x0.7)
Multithread
3500
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
12.56k
5.04k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
7.46k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
3.75k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.49k
1.48k (x0.99)
TOTAL
32.72k
17.73k (x0.54)
Performance/W
3500
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
93 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
503 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1978 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1966 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1039 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
5686 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4