A6 3500 vs 9210
Description
The 3500 is based on K10 architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500 gets a score of 32.7 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500 is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
300f10
670f00
Core
Llano
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FM1
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
3/3
2/2
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
3x64+3x64 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
3x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
August 2011
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
13.65k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.72k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4.75k
4.87k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
4.72k
10.38k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.59k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.69k
2.38k (x1.41)
TOTAL
13.65k
20.22k (x1.48)
Multithread
3500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12.56k
7.41k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.58k
11.87k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
3.35k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.49k
2.6k (x1.74)
TOTAL
32.72k
25.23k (x0.77)
Performance/W
3500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
194 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
93 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
23 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
503 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1978 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1966 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1039 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
704 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5686 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4