A4 6300B vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 8.2 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 8.2 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
206d7
Core
Richland
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
15360 kB
Date
December 2013
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
6.95k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
6.24k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
3.05k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
2.56k (x1.7)
TOTAL
20.11k
18.8k (x0.93)
Multithread
6300B
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
90.01k (x8.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
82.43k (x8.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
42.59k (x8.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
9.66k (x5.94)
TOTAL
27.54k
224.7k (x8.16)
Performance/W
6300B
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300B
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4