| | | | | | |

A4 6300B vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 8.6 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
a0653
Core
Richland
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/12
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
307.18k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
12.5k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
19.05k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
4.72k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
10.3k (x6.82)
TOTAL
20.11k
46.57k (x2.32)

Multithread

6300B

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
74.58k (x6.85)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
126.96k (x12.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
31.76k (x6.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
2.5k (x1.54)
TOTAL
27.54k
235.8k (x8.56)

Performance/W
6300B
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
6737 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300B
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4