| | | | | | |

A4 6300B vs Core i3-6100U


Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-6100U gets 56.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100U is 2.1 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
610f31
406e3
Core
Richland
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2013
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
69.94k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
8.06k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
12.85k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
3.14k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
4.01k (x2.65)
TOTAL
20.11k
28.06k (x1.4)

Multithread

6300B

i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
16.58k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
28.88k (x2.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
7.38k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
3.82k (x2.35)
TOTAL
27.54k
56.66k (x2.06)

Performance/W
6300B
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
1925 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
492 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
254 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
3777 points/W

Performance/GHz
6300B
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
3506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1366 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
1742 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
12201 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4