A4 6300B vs Core i3-3120M
Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the i3-3120M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-3120M gets 47.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3120M is 1.7 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the i3-3120M gets 47.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3120M is 1.7 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
306a9
Core
Richland
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2013
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
22.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
47.78k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
7.92k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
7.96k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
3.09k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
3.15k (x2.08)
TOTAL
20.11k
22.12k (x1.1)
Multithread
6300B
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
16.82k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
19k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
7.7k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
4.25k (x2.61)
TOTAL
27.54k
47.78k (x1.74)
Performance/W
6300B
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
481 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
220 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
1365 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300B
i3-3120M
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
3169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
3182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
1236 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
8847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4