A4 6300B vs FX 6300
Description
Both models 6300B and 6300 are based on Piledriver architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 2.4 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 6300 gets 66.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300 is 2.4 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
600f20
Core
Richland
Vishera
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2013
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
23.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
66.43k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
7.71k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
7.41k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
2.81k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
5.2k (x3.44)
TOTAL
20.11k
23.14k (x1.15)
Multithread
6300B
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
25.2k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
25.83k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
11.47k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
3.92k (x2.41)
TOTAL
27.54k
66.43k (x2.41)
Performance/W
6300B
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
699 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300B
6300
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
1951 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
6088 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4