A4 6300B vs Athlon 5150 APU
Description
The 6300B is based on Piledriver architecture while the 5150 APU is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 1.1 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 6300B gets a score of 27.5 k points while the 5150 APU gets 30.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5150 APU is 1.1 times faster than the 6300B. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
610f31
700f01
Core
Richland
Kabini
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FM2
AM1
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x16+64 kB
256 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
December 2013
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.11k points
8.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.54k points
30.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
6300B
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
8.35k
3.02k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
7.31k
2.62k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.95k
1.59k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.51k
1.02k (x0.68)
TOTAL
20.11k
8.26k (x0.41)
Multithread
6300B
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
12.06k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
10.01k
10.42k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
6.32k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.63k
1.26k (x0.78)
TOTAL
27.54k
30.06k (x1.09)
Performance/W
6300B
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
167 points/W
483 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
154 points/W
417 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
77 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
424 points/W
1203 points/W
Performance/GHz
6300B
5150 APU
Test#1 (Integers)
2140 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1873 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
756 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
387 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
TOTAL
5157 points/GHz
5162 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4