A4 5000 vs Core i3-5005U
Description
The 5000 is based on Jaguar architecture while the i3-5005U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the i3-5005U gets 47.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-5005U is 1.9 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the i3-5005U gets 47.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-5005U is 1.9 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
306d4
Core
Kabini
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
7.38k points
25.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.71k points
54.99k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5000
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.58k
6.24k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
8.82k (x3.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.39k
2.38k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.98k
2.4k (x2.46)
TOTAL
7.38k
19.84k (x2.69)
Multithread
5000
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.55k
12.33k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
8.66k
25.82k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
6.56k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
3.18k (x2.2)
TOTAL
24.71k
47.89k (x1.94)
Performance/W
5000
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
637 points/W
822 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
577 points/W
1721 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
337 points/W
437 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
212 points/W
TOTAL
1647 points/W
3193 points/W
Performance/GHz
5000
i3-5005U
Test#1 (Integers)
1721 points/GHz
3118 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/GHz
4411 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1189 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
650 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
TOTAL
4917 points/GHz
9920 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4