| | | | | | |

A4 5000 vs Core i3-4030U


Description
The 5000 is based on Jaguar architecture while the i3-4030U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the i3-4030U gets 35.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 1.5 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
700f01
40651
Core
Kabini
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2013
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
7.38k points
21.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.71k points
46.09k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5000
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.58k
6.4k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
6.2k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.39k
2.5k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.98k
2.05k (x2.1)
TOTAL
7.38k
17.15k (x2.32)

Multithread

5000

i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.55k
12.86k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.66k
15.12k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
5.76k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
2.15k (x1.48)
TOTAL
24.71k
35.88k (x1.45)

Performance/W
5000
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
637 points/W
857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
577 points/W
1008 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
337 points/W
384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
143 points/W
TOTAL
1647 points/W
2392 points/W

Performance/GHz
5000
i3-4030U
Test#1 (Integers)
1721 points/GHz
3366 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/GHz
3263 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
650 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
TOTAL
4917 points/GHz
9024 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4