A4 5000 vs A9 9420
Description
The 5000 is based on Jaguar architecture while the 9420 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5000 gets a score of 24.7 k points while the 9420 gets 26.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
700f01
670f00
Core
Kabini
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FT3
Micro-BGA
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
May 2013
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
7.38k points
33.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
24.71k points
46.33k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
2.58k
7.55k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
2.43k
13.9k (x5.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.39k
3.11k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.98k
2.18k (x2.23)
TOTAL
7.38k
26.74k (x3.62)
Multithread
5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
9.55k
9.09k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
8.66k
12.25k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
3k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.81k (x1.25)
TOTAL
24.71k
26.15k (x1.06)
Performance/W
5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
637 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
577 points/W
817 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
337 points/W
200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
1647 points/W
1743 points/W
Performance/GHz
5000
9420
Test#1 (Integers)
1721 points/GHz
2096 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/GHz
3862 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
926 points/GHz
864 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
650 points/GHz
604 points/GHz
TOTAL
4917 points/GHz
7427 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4