| | | | | | |

A10 9630P vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 7.2 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
406f1
Core
Bristol Ridge
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2016
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
237.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
12.16k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
11.82k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.02k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
2.4k (x1.34)
TOTAL
23.7k
29.39k (x1.24)

Multithread

9630P

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
103.77k (x8.09)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
102.28k (x7.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
26.13k (x7.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
5.65k (x2.75)
TOTAL
32.92k
237.83k (x7.22)

Performance/W
9630P
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
9630P
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4