A10 9630P vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 4.3 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 4.3 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
306c3
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
45 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
June 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
19.17k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
10.55k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
4.79k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
4.65k (x2.6)
TOTAL
23.7k
39.16k (x1.65)
Multithread
9630P
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
73.13k (x5.7)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
42.06k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
18.03k (x5)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
7.54k (x3.67)
TOTAL
32.92k
140.76k (x4.28)
Performance/W
9630P
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4