A10 9630P vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 6.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 6.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
50657
Core
Bristol Ridge
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
June 2016
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
12.92k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
10.97k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.54k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
5.09k (x2.84)
TOTAL
23.7k
31.52k (x1.33)
Multithread
9630P
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
103.33k (x8.06)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
87.67k (x6.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
20.1k (x5.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
4.91k (x2.39)
TOTAL
32.92k
216.02k (x6.56)
Performance/W
9630P
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4