A10 9630P vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the m3-7Y30 is 1.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
806e9
Core
Bristol Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
10.02k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
9.22k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
2.04k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
4.31k (x2.41)
TOTAL
23.7k
25.6k (x1.08)
Multithread
9630P
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
21.75k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
20.51k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
4.97k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
5.56k (x2.71)
TOTAL
32.92k
52.78k (x1.6)
Performance/W
9630P
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4