| | | | | | |

A10 9630P vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.8 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
40651
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
57.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
13.79k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
7.79k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.11k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
2.72k (x1.52)
TOTAL
23.7k
27.41k (x1.16)

Multithread

9630P

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
28.78k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
18.99k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
7.21k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.6k (x1.27)
TOTAL
32.92k
57.58k (x1.75)

Performance/W
9630P
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
3839 points/W

Performance/GHz
9630P
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4