| | | | | | |

A10 9630P vs Core i5-4200U


Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-4200U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the i5-4200U gets 55.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4200U is 1.7 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
660f51
40651
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2016
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
27.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
55.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
14.07k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
7.66k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.13k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
2.98k (x1.67)
TOTAL
23.7k
27.84k (x1.17)

Multithread

9630P

i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
26.12k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
17.92k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
6.74k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
5.03k (x2.45)
TOTAL
32.92k
55.81k (x1.7)

Performance/W
9630P
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1742 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
449 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
335 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
3721 points/W

Performance/GHz
9630P
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
5411 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
2946 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
1148 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
10709 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4