A10 9630P vs A9 9425
Description
Both models 9630P and 9425 are based on Excavator architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9425 is 1.3 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9425 is 1.3 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
670f00
Core
Bristol Ridge
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
1024 kB
Date
June 2016
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
11.23k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
14.7k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.15k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
2.24k (x1.25)
TOTAL
23.7k
31.31k (x1.32)
Multithread
9630P
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
16.58k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
17.84k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
5.09k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.23k (x1.09)
TOTAL
32.92k
41.73k (x1.27)
Performance/W
9630P
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4