A10 9630P vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3020e is 1.6 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
820f01
Core
Bristol Ridge
Dali
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
9.28k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
14.56k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
3.44k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
2.06k (x1.15)
TOTAL
23.7k
29.34k (x1.24)
Multithread
9630P
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
15.75k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
28.63k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
5.87k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.17k (x1.06)
TOTAL
32.92k
52.42k (x1.59)
Performance/W
9630P
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4