A10 9630P vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 12.1 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 12.1 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
90675
Core
Bristol Ridge
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
18432 kB
Date
June 2016
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
33.85k (x3.97)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
20.33k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
10.51k (x4.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
11.77k (x6.57)
TOTAL
23.7k
76.46k (x3.23)
Multithread
9630P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
174.21k (x13.58)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
141.31k (x9.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
64.86k (x18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
19.01k (x9.26)
TOTAL
32.92k
399.39k (x12.13)
Performance/W
9630P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4